Big data for the people: it's time to take it back from our tech overlords
Blog 3: Big data for
the people: it's time to take it back from our tech overlords
Amy Le 黎草嵋
D0731311
A small number of companies have become extraordinarily rich
by harvesting our data. But that wealth belongs to the many.
Google knows you’re pregnant. Spotify knows your favorite
throwback jams.
Is this convenient or creepy? It depends. One minute, you’re
grateful for the personalized precision of Netflix’s recommendations. The next,
you’re nauseated by the personalized precision of a Facebook ad.
Big data has been around for a while, but our
discomfort with it is relatively recent. The election of Donald Trump punctured
many powerful fictions, among them the belief in the beneficence of the tech
industry. There is now greater public awareness of how a handful of large
companies use technology to monitor and manipulate us.
This awareness is a wonderful thing. But if we want to
channel the bad feelings swirling around tech into something more enduring, we
need to radicalize the conversation. It’s good that more people see a problem
where they didn’t before. The next step is showing them that the problem is
larger than they think.
Big data is not confined to the cluster of companies that we
know, somewhat imprecisely, as the tech industry. Rather, it describes a
particular way of acquiring and organizing information that is increasingly
indispensable to the economy as a whole. When you think about big data, you
shouldn’t just think about Google and Facebook; you should think about manufacturing
and retail and logistics and healthcare.
Understanding big data, then, is crucial for understanding
what capitalism currently is and what it is becoming – and how we might
transform it.
Data is the new oil, says, everyone. The analogy
has become something of a cliché, widely deployed in media coverage of the
digital economy.
But it’s a useful comparison – more useful, in fact,
than people realize. Because thinking of data as a resource like oil helps
illuminate not only how it functions, but how we might organize it differently.
Big data is extractive. It involves extracting data from
various “mines” – Facebook, say, or a connected piece of industrial equipment.
This raw material must then be “refined” into potentially valuable knowledge by
combining it with other data and analyzing it.
Technology helps set the parameters of possibility. It
frames our range of potential futures, but it doesn’t select one for us. The
potential futures framed by big data have a particularly wide range: they run
from the somewhat annoying to the very miserable, from the reasonably humane to
the delightfully utopian. Where we land in this grid will come down to who owns
the machines, and how they’re used – a matter for power, and politics, to
decide.
Comments
Post a Comment